Re: rfc:trailing-comma-function-args

On 22.02.2013 22:46, Sebastian Krebs wrote: > /sign > Especially about the "implies, that another optional argument may exist": > One does not simply add arbitrary arguments to a function call. Except when > the function signature changes, but in this case (to repeat myself) the > additional diff-line is negligible. I've thought about this, and the only function I'm using often enough to have this change be needed/nice/finally there is sprintf - it's the only function with variable number of arguments that's bitten me with the trailing comma at least once a month - but not a single other function I can think ok. (Maybe I should use more var_dump though...) Greetings, Florian