Re: About restricting the recursive implicit calls
| From: | Bob Weinand | Date: | Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:33:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: About restricting the recursive implicit calls | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-66210@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Am 25.2.2013 um 19:10 schrieb Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>:
> Hi!
>
>> Yes, but you can do an approximation. And in 99.999% of the cases 100
>> will be enough. I can hardly imagine a case where you need to do over
>> 100 implicit function calls. They should fit in every normal stack size of
>> servers today.
>
> Depth-first search in a modest-size data structure would easily go over
> 100. But if you need it, xdebug already has this option.
>
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
No, no, ...
You may use recursive functions (which are limited by the memory_limit),
but if you use recursive magics, it's a design error. This is not the purpose
of magics (, call_user_func(_array)?) and simply an abuse of the language.
Bob