Re: Allow (...)->foo() expressions not only for `new`

From: Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:20:16 +0000
Subject: Re: Allow (...)->foo() expressions not only for `new`
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-66221@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Am 25.2.2013 um 23:07 schrieb Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>: >> (For me, it's changes like Sara's trailing comma proposal that are too >> small to have needed an RFC) >> > When it comes to changing syntax, there is no such thing as too small > of an RFC IMO. Runtime changes can occasionally be hand-waved, but > syntax changes are serious business. > > -Sara Don't consider it as a syntax change, only as a bugfix. It must have been a bug, that this degree of conformity was not yet reached. :-P It's only stupid to vote about such microscopic changes as long as there are no real arguments against it in the discussion preceding the implementation. Bob

« previous php.internals (#66221) next »