Re: [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution
| From: | Anthony Ferrara | Date: | Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:58:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-66548@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Philip,
Shouldn't we be focusing on how this makes PHP better? And not nitpick
> about a percentage point or two?
>
Well, this passed with 62.8%. Property accessors failed with 60.7%. The
target for acceptance is 66.6%. So 3.8% is enough to throw away, but 5.9%
isn't?
I think the point of this discussion is that rules are rules for a reason.
You can't be high and holy and deny one RFC judiciously, and then hand-wave
and say the next RFC doesn't matter because the intention is there (or
whatever rationale is).
Either we stick to the rules, or we throw them out and install a BDFL.
Either way, I don't care. I just think the current
they-sometimes-matter-depending-on-who-and-when-it-is-raised stance is
deeper than BS, it's dangerous and is actively turning away contributors
(as well as harming the project)...
Anthony