Re: Cannot call constructor

> Hi. > > I'm not an expert here, so just thinking out loud ... > > If a theoretical \PHP\baseclass can have empty __construct()/__destruct(), > what about the other magic methods? > > OK, I suppose cascading some of the magic methods to a parent and having a > null parent at the very very bottom of the heap sounds useful. But I'm not > totally sure. > > Is there much/any need for a true base class that ALL classes will extend > from, including those in extensions. > it was discussed in the linked thread, personally I agree that those are different both in intention and implementation, so shouldn't affected by this change. ps: for example having an empty __sleep() or __wakeup implementation would be entirely differrent that one would expect. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu