Re: RE: Announcing RFC 'Anonymous Catches'

From: Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:49:07 +0000
Subject: Re: RE: Announcing RFC 'Anonymous Catches'
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-67819@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 25 June 2013 20:17, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > I don't think we need to change the language because Netbeans can't > figure out how catch blocks work. This change doesn't provide any > functionality that wasn't available before it, and does not make the > code clearer - on the contrary, IMO it makes debugging harder and people IMO actually it *makes* the code clearer, because $ignoredException is not used, though a variable name like $ignored is self-explanatory, too. > reading the code more confused. In PHP, we always valued clarity over > brevity, and I think we should keep it this way. Duh, I find that statement a bit brave, though ;) .oO(__{get,set,call,etc…}, object operators) -- Regards, Mike

« previous php.internals (#67819) next »