Re: Static and non-static methods
| From: | J Smith | Date: | Fri, 04 Apr 2003 17:06:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Static and non-static methods | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-681@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It's been said before, but PHP isn't C++ or Java, so why would they have to
be compatible?
J
Per Lundberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 18:07, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
>> > > Well its a BC nightmare, and I don't really see any big advantage.
>> > Agreed, breaking BC for this sounds like a bad idea to me.
>> <vent> sometimes I just hate BC.. </vent>
>
> Why only sometimes?
>
> Besides, it is much a matter of asking yourself: what is most important,
> being compatible with old PHP ugly-OO code or compatibility with other
> OO-languages such as C++ and Java?
>
> I know what I would answer to that question. :-)
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Per Lundberg / Capio ApS
> Phone: +46-18-4186040
> Fax: +46-18-4186049
> Web: http://www.nobolt.com