Re: [RFC] Importing namespaced functions

Hi, Thanks for that. But actually I don't see: Why is "use" not enough? As far as I can see your example, why it would introduce a BC, doesn't really match to original question, why "use function" is used. Especially I don't see any ambiguity: foo(); // Always a function. You cannot call classes this way new foo(); // always a class foo::bar(); // Always a class But the example I mentioned before namespace { function bar() {}} namespace foo { function bar() {}} namespace { use foo\bar; bar();} points to a different problem, which I didn't see solved by adding the "function"-keyword to "use". Can you clarify this? Because I'd try to avoid new syntax wherever possible. Regards, Sebastian 2013/7/23 Igor Wiedler <igor@wiedler.ch> > Hi, > > Based on Sebastian's feedback I have updated the RFC and the patch to > include a use const sequence that works just like > use function, but for > namespaced constants. > > Example usage: > > namespace foo\bar { > const baz = 42; > } > > namespace { > use const foo\bar\baz; > var_dump(baz); > } > > I also fixed some other issues that the original patch had in the process > (see commit history). Please keep the feedback coming. > > Thanks, > > Igor > > -- github.com/KingCrunch