Re: date.timezone E_WARNING -- Really necessary? What's the rationale?
| From: | Nikita Popov | Date: | Mon, 02 Sep 2013 11:16:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: date.timezone E_WARNING -- Really necessary? What's the rationale? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-68845@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Daniel Lowrey <rdlowrey@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm probably not the typical PHP user; I spend 99% of my PHP time
> > > using the CLI (and not web SAPIs).
> > > This means that I frequently run PHP without an .ini file. As a
> > > result, when I use any of the date/time
> > > functionality I invariably end up with this awesomeness:
> > >
> > > > Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone
> > > settings blah blah blah.
> > >
> >
> > I was thinking about this again and maybe we could reach the following
> > compromise:
> >
> > * Set date.timezone = UTC as the default INI value
> > * In php.ini-production and php.ini-development uncomment the
> > ;date.timezone =
> > line, i.e. change it to
> > date.timezone =
>
> No, php.ini-development should have what PHP does by default.
>
That's not the case currently and as far as I know that is so
intentionally. ini-development and PHP defaults differ not just in obscure
extension settings, but also in core options like error_reporting,
short_tags, maximum_execution_time, variables_order, register_argc_argv,
display_startup_errors, output_buffering, etc etc etc. If these differences
are not intentional, we should fix this. But I'm pretty sure they are.
Nikita