Re: Proposal: Introduction of InvalidStateException

As a reminder, we do not top-post :) @Ferenc: Ok, so let's try to wrap all these suggestion in the SPL RFC you > pointed out and vote. > In case you didn't notice, I started that RFC quite some time ago ^^ Everything still applies. > @Levi: I'd suggest to minimize BC breaks if you're willing to get this > merged. > Dunno how to proceed here, but that should be the focus. > I think major BC breaks can still make it in, we'd just have to go a different route. I was thinking something along the lines of another extension and eventually deprecate the SPL. I do agree that smaller BC breaks have a better chance of making it in, as well as making it in sooner. I suppose I'll compromise to some degree and compile a list of BC-safe changes and list them in the RFC.