Re: RFC: phpdbg
| From: | Chris London | Date: | Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:46:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: phpdbg | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-70261@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:
> On 21 November 2013 15:38, Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net> wrote:
> > On 11/21/2013 02:20 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> >> I'm probably missing some context here, maybe you could explain how
> phpdbg
> >> differs from something like xdebug? I mean, xdebug seems to be the
> >> de-facto
> >> debugging extension for PHP and has been for a long time, but we're not
> >> bundling it. Why should we bundle phpdbg instead?
> >
> > This is not an extension, it is a SAPI module. The build system
> does
> > not support external SAPI modules, the implementation requires Zend API
> > which is not exported (or wasn't, has since been patched).
>
> That still does not answer the question, though?!
>
>
My question is very similar. Why not just bundle xdebug?