Re: Re: Power function as operator
| From: | Tjerk Meesters | Date: | Sun, 24 Nov 2013 06:51:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Power function as operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-70346@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Derick,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
>
> > As for the associativity argument (assuming the precedence is now
> > correct), if not resolved before the voting begins, I would suggest to
> > move that into the vote itself, i.e.:
>
> > a) don't implement;
> > b) yes, with left associativity;
> > c) yes, with right associativity.
>
> Shouldn't this include:
>
> d) yes, with *no* associativity?
>
Yes, it should. I'm proposing to split the voting into two sections:
1. Whether it should be included in the first place
2. And if so, how it should behave in terms of associativity (assuming
precedence is agreed upon).
>
> cheers,
> Derick
>
--
--
Tjerk