Re: Re: rfc: pow-operator
| From: | Galen Wright-Watson | Date: | Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:16:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: rfc: pow-operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-70370@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Tjerk Meesters
<tjerk.meesters@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meesters@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Pierre,
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> Should it not be possible to do something similar than isset? Changing
> >> pow from a function to operator? The big advantage is that any
> >> existing code will benefit from it without code changes.
> >>
> >
> > Speeding up existing code sounds like a very good idea actually :) I'll
> > look into this.
> >
>
> Following up on this; I've turned pow() into a language construct now.
> [...]
Does that mean that 'pow', like 'empty' and 'isset', can't be
passed as a
callback?