RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Three new GD functions

From: Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 01:30:23 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Three new GD functions
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-705@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I haven't done a comparison, but imagecopyrotated() isn't something I made -- I ported it from the latest version of the GD library. If you think you could make a better imagecopyrotated() I don't have a problem with it, but I don't really see a great deal of need. John -~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~- John Coggeshall john at coggeshall dot org http://www.coggeshall.org/ -~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~- >-----Original Message----- >From: Pierre-Alain Joye [mailto:paj@pearfr.org] >Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:11 PM >To: John Coggeshall >Cc: internals@lists.php.net >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Three new GD functions > > >On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:11:04 -0500 >"John Coggeshall" <john@coggeshall.org> wrote: > >> >> I've ported three GD functions from the 2.0.12 version of GD >into the >> bundled version: imagesetclip(), imagegetclip(), and >> imagecopyrotated()... I may go through and port more but I wanted to >> see the response to this before I wasted more time... > >I can take care of imagecopyrotated using the actual >imagerotate function, which provides a better quality. > >Do you agree? > >pierre >

« previous php.internals (#705) next »