Re: Re: [vote] pow-operator
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 2013 02:08:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [vote] pow-operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-70738@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Tjerk Meesters
<tjerk.meesters@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kris,
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> That said, if there are other reasons for voting 'no' besides
>>> associativity, feel free to shoot me an email or discuss it on the list.
>>>
>>
>> What did it for me was the lower precedence for the unary minus. I don't
>> want to have another language that thinks a negative number squared is a
>> negative number. I understand and respect your reasoning as outlined in
>> the RFC, but this is a deal-breaker for me.
>>
>
> I've had a short discussion with Anthony about this and he convinced me
> that I was indeed wrong about my "unary minus" reasoning; therefore I have
> updated the RFC to reflect that. So:
>
I'm a little bit confused.
Are you modifying the poll, and the rfc itself, in the middle of a vote?
-Hannes