Re: Introducing "Array Of" RFC

From: Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 04:49:41 +0000
Subject: Re: Introducing "Array Of" RFC
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-71235@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi all, On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arrayof > > > I'm going to fowl up this conversation by describing what HHVM's Hack > syntax does for this. Partly to encourage PHP to do the same, partly > to just lay out the edge cases we thought about on the way to > developing the syntax we landed with. > > * Generics Syntax - Allows creation of typed classes which repeat > common functionality with specific implementations > class Foo<T> { > protected T $foo; > > public function getFoo(): T { > return $this->foo; > } > > pubilc function setFoo(T $foo) { > $this->foo = $foo; > } > } > > $f = new Foo<Bar>(); > $f->setFoo(new Bar()); > $b = $f->getFoo(); > > * Typed arrays - Arrays are a special primitive which can be typed as > implicitly or explicitly numerically indexed, or associative, and to > specific types: > array<Tv> or array<Tk,Tv> > > function foo(array<Bar> $numIdxArrayOfBar, array<int,Baz> > $numIdxArrayOfBaz, array<string,$Bong> $assocArrayOfBong) { ... } > > Since the value type is unconstrained, it can be a generic type as > well, so a numerically indexed array of associative arrays of strings > would look like array<array<string,string>> and so on. > > * Nullable types - Any type preceeded by a question mark may be that > type or null: > function foo(?Bar $barOrNull, Baz $bar, ?Blong $blongOrNull) {...} > > * Soft types - Any type preceeded by an at sign is hinted as that > type, but not checked: > function foo(@Bar $IHopeYoureABarObject) {...} > > ---------------------------------------------- > > Within the scope of this RFC, I want to encourage > array<Tv>/array<Tk,Tv> syntax (with nullable/soft modifiers) as I > think they cover every edge case presented by this discussion so far. > It also covers elements not handled by the proposed syntax (index > types). The syntax will be familiar to developers coming from C++ and > it leaves room to entertain generics in general. > I prefer generics syntax. It's rather common syntax and has more abilities. It's better to have common syntax with HHVM, too. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net

« previous php.internals (#71235) next »