Re: [RFC] 64 bit improvements, open questions
| From: | Christopher Jones | Date: | Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:01:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] 64 bit improvements, open questions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-71463@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 01/23/2014 12:47 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
Hi Chris, On Wed, January 22, 2014 20:36, Christopher Jones wrote:I'm not a huge fan of multiple votes. I hope a consensus can be reached via the mail list first.The open issues (e.g. SAPI support) need to be resolved before starting the vote, so the RFC direction is obvious. Also the RFC needs to discuss proposed voting options, prior to starting the vote. Since that only gives a couple of days for discussion, I think you should delay the vote.I'm not sure taking SAPI and ZPP topics out of the scope apart into new RFCs would make any sense? But we probably can do multple votings in the same RFC. That will be probably the most plausible solution to decide, I gonna to update it :)
It can be a separate section of the RFC. This will make the project's scope clear when it comes to voting on the RFC. Chris -- christopher.jones@oracle.com http://twitter.com/ghrd Free PHP & Oracle book: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.htmlThe porting doc compat/PECL_PORTING should be merged into the RFC (and removed from the tree) to capture as much information in the one place as possible.I thought more like pick it out into a separate wiki page, as it's porting specific. Still it will be linked from/to RFC, but the structure were cleaner IMHO.