Re: Extending uniqid() or not?

From: Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 07:35:46 +0000
Subject: Re: Extending uniqid() or not?
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-71977@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 02.02.14 05:32, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > string safe_uniqid([ing $length=64]) > > It generate ID using good RNG such as /dev/urandom, /dev/arandom for > UNIXes, openssl RNG for Windows when they are available. It does not use > hash function, but simply convert RNG binary data into text. The same > algorithm that is used for session ID may be used. (Use > hash_bits_per_character=5, since it only contains alphanumeric chars) Since > it does not use hash, it's fast. > > Any comments? Any good names? The documentation for uniqid() is pretty clear about the fact that it's not cryptographically secure and recomends openssl_random_pseudo_bytes() as a replacement. Shouldn't we just try to come up with sane default values for its $length parameter instead of adding yet another new function? > P.S. Is anyone working UUID? PostgreSQL is using OSSP's UUID lib, it's good > for PHP. > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/uuid-ossp.html There's http://pecl.php.net/package/uuid. - Martin

« previous php.internals (#71977) next »