Re: RFC: expectations/assertions

On 02/02/2014 11:25 AM, Joe Watkins wrote:

Morning Internals [, and Dmitry :)],

     I came across a reason to think about assertions again today, my

original, pretty radical, patch was worked on by dmitry, I updated the RFC a while ago but allowed the conversation to die down.

     Nikita pointed this out around the same time:

     https://gist.github.com/krakjoe/4a2145e5a6ddc26b1dc1

     Still, there's no reason for us to have a crappy assertion api as

part of the core just because there's a way around it(-ish) in user land.

     So, I think now is a good time to revive the discussion, the patch

is pretty unobjectionable, and has been updated for master.

     I'd like to move this to a vote pretty swiftly, any objections ?

Cheers Joe

Woops2, https://gist.github.com/krakjoe/c6bcbb4e6d019c9297db Dunno what happened there .. Cheers Joe