Tidy, CS, OO, Vote
| From: | John Coggeshall | Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:00:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Tidy, CS, OO, Vote | ||
| Groups: | php.internals | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-7217@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Alright..
I've got a patch sitting here on my laptop that converts all of the OO
syntax in the tidy extension into studlyCaps. I.e.
$tidy = tidy_parse_file();
or
$tidy = new tidy();
$tidy->parse_file();
Will become..
$tidy = tidy_parse_file()
or
$tidy = new tidy();
$tidy->parseFile();
Although my *personal* preference here is to maintain the current use of
underscores (since it is consistent with the procedural API).. as far as
PHP 5 goes itself I don't really have an opinion. I'm willing to apply
this patch, but before I do can I please get a +1 -1 vote on this?
*please* no discussion, I just want to be done changing the API so the
documentation team can actually do something productive.
John
--
-=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=-
John Coggeshall http://www.coggeshall.org/
The PHP Developer's Handbook http://www.php-handbook.com/
-=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=-