Re: RFCs: length of voting process.
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Wed, 05 Feb 2014 06:10:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFCs: length of voting process. | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-72238@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Feb 5, 2014 3:16 AM, "Yasuo Ohgaki" <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Levi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gmail.com
>wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I don't find any problem with a week being the voting period. You
already
> > > have, at the very least, 2 weeks prior to any vote to discuss the RFC.
> > >
> >
> > Except its fairly often that people change the RFC within this window
so
> > when it goes to vote you have to review stuff. And if you are busy that
> > week then... well, you miss the vote.
>
>
> This is because people tends to read RFC when voting.
> To address this issue, close vote, discuss, reopen vote, is the
> way to go. Reopened vote should be a week or more. Minimum
> 2 weeks seems too much to me.
But then it is debatable, depending on the change, including the
implementation. I think it is fair to have 2 weeks again to discuss and
test the changes.
Cheers,
Pierre