Re: [VOTE][RFC] Array Of

Adam Harvey wrote on 28.02.2014 19:00: > On 28 February 2014 09:45, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: >> >> On 28 Feb 2014, at 17:30, Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> I voted no now. >>> >>> a) This is something for PHP6 I feel (at least if the other RFCs were >>> rejected for similar reasons) >>> b) We are so close to beta 5.6 now, I think we should stop introducing bigger >>> features which affect the language etc. now >>> c) I'm not really sure if we want that feature… but that's another story... >> >> >> I also voted against. I don’t like the [] syntax and PHP 5.6 is too close. > > I was also -1, partly for those reasons, but also because I think we > need to take some time (probably in a PHP 5++/6/7/whatever context and > after 5.6 has been frozen) to figure out if we want generics and, if > so, what form they would take syntactically. My guess is that they > won't look anything like ClassName[], and I don't really want another > weird syntax appendix that we have to maintain and document for a > decade or more to come. > > Adam > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > What about adding isarrayof to class declaration? class DbRow {} class DbRows isarrayof DbRow {} function test(DbRows $rows) {} Regards, Thomas