Re: [VOTE] RFC: Introduce session_start() options - read_only, unsafe_lock, lazy_write and

Hi Yasuo, You're answering the wrong question. :) What I asked is if the following example is possible: // start a session with cookie name 'foo' session_start(['name' => 'foo']); Cheers, Andrey. On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net> wrote: >> >> Because this isn't really clear from the RFC ... can I assume that INI >> options can also be passed to session_start()? Having only lazy_write, >> read_only as options would be inconvenient. :) > > > Many people don't like INI. (Although I love INIs :) > Therefore, new options are allowed only as session_start() options. > > I don't mind at all having session.read_only=0 as default and users set it > to session.read_only=1, then change it writable either > ini_set('session.read_only', FALSE) or > session_start(['read_only'=>FALSE]); > as needed. > > I have to propose the change, though. > > Regards, > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > yohgaki@ohgaki.net >