Re: [PR 614] ArrayObject and isset() / empty() behaviour
| From: | Tjerk Meesters | Date: | Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:20:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PR 614] ArrayObject and isset() / empty() behaviour | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-73052@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meesters@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Etienne,
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Etienne Kneuss <colder@php.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Tjerk Meesters <
>>> tjerk.meesters@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Tjerk Meesters <
>>>> tjerk.meesters@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Etienne,
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for your input, much appreciated.
>>>> >
>>>> > I have moved the decision up the chain as you suggested; the results
>>>> can
>>>> > be found here:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > https://github.com/datibbaw/php-src/compare/php:PHP-5.4...bug66834a
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > It's suffering from a few memory leaks which can be fixed,
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> They are fixed now and a new PR has been opened:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/616
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Etienne,
>>>
>>> Are you fine with the changes in the PR?
>>>
>>>
>> Two things:
>>
>> 1) Where is this planned to be merged? Is it really 5.4 ? As is the PR is
>> no longer a simple bug fix and while I agree it should be changed that way,
>> it might introduce hard-to-track BC breaks.
>>
>
> After a short discussion on IRC I'm moving the branch to target 5.6
> instead.
>
>
>> 2) Seems to me that with this PR, part of the hack present in ArrayObject
>> in the has_dimension handler is no longer necessary, as it might be doing
>> to value-check twice now.
>>
>
> I'll start looking into this now. Thanks for the heads up :)
>
I've updated and cleaned up ext/spl; the most notable change is code
removal according to a changed definition of zend_object_has_dimension_t:
typedef int (*zend_object_has_dimension_t)(zval *object, zval *member
TSRMLS_DC);
PR: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/621
Let me know if you see any other issues; I'm fine with reverting the
typedef change if that could be an issue.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> --
>>> Ferenc Kovács
>>> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Etienne Kneuss
>> http://www.colder.ch
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Tjerk
>
--
--
Tjerk