Re: base class

From:	Christian Schneider	Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:11:44 +0000
Subject:	Re: base class
References:	1 2 3 4	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to internals+get-7329@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

Marcus Boerger wrote:

I can very much understand the drive behind this whish. The patch consists of two parts. The first part is generating an error message in case no constructor is available. He uses E_NOTICE while i would prefer E_STRICT

Both E_NOTICE or E_STRICT are fine with me. Whatever people feel is more appropriate.

there. Then the second part is a bit strange. It looks like if we could ignore other functions/methods with the patch.that doesn't look right.

No, it avoids the segfault caused by the previous patch because in that case EX(function_state).function never gets set. I don't change anything for other function calls as function is always set (otherwise it would have caused a segfault w/o my patch anyway). - Chris