Re: --enable-all

On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Marcus Börger wrote: >At 19:48 05.04.2003, Jani Taskinen wrote: >>On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Marcus Börger wrote: >> >> >I just noticed the fact that --enable-all also works for all --with-xyz by >> >being mailed about it. IMHO there should be an --with-all. This because >> >we have a clear difference between --enable-xy and --with-xy. This >> >difference should hold for --enable-all, too. >> >> I never advertized --enable-all. It was just a side-effect of >> --disable-all and should never be used by anyone. >> >> I removed the --enable-all from the configure help now. >> I'll disable it fully later.. >> > >Jani, IMO --enable-all is a good thing but it shouldn't apply to --with >extensions. So perhaps we should have an undocumented --with-all >and make --enable-all what it is supposed to. No. --disable-all is fine as it is. I don't want to add any MORE options to get the smallest possible build: ./configure --disable-all --disable-cgi Having to add also --without-all..well..it's just stupid. --Jani