Re: Some missing stream-wrapper functions

Hi! > But some very few functions like being able to "trap" symlink-calls > inside a stream-wrapper are still missing. Could somebody familiar with > that implementation maybe consider adding the missing functions so you > can "hook" into them with a custom stream-wrapper? Note that symlink is not available for many streams, as it makes sense only on certain filesystems. So it is not very generic operation. But if somebody proposes an RFC it can be done I guess. There are also link(), readlink(), etc. so it is not trivial. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227