Re: [RFC] Return Type Declarations
| From: | Pete Boere | Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:08:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Return Type Declarations | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-73795@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Nice proposal.
FWIW on the
use issue I much prefer the first alternative:
function ($foo): Bar use ($quux) {}
function ($foo) use ($quux): Bar {}
On 25 April 2014 10:09, Lazare Inepologlou <linepogl@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2014-04-24 17:59 GMT+02:00 Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>:
>
> > My dear Internals friends,
> >
> > I have spent the last month drafting an RFC that allows return types:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/returntypehinting
> >
> > Notable items:
> > - Differences from past RFCs are summarized in the RFC:
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/returntypehinting#differences_from_past_rfcs
> > - The patch includes basic opcache and reflection support. It also has
> > phpt tests.
> > - Informal performance tests indicate that the patch did not fubar
> > performance; if desired a more detailed test can be conducted before
> > voting.
> > - This RFC does not add, modify, or remove keywords at all; this
> notably
> > excludes type-hints for scalars. Supporting scalar type declarations is
> > outside the scope of this RFC; if you are interested in supporting scalar
> > type declarations please discuss it elsewhere.
> >
> > As a friendly reminder, everyone on this list is interested in
> developing a
> > better PHP and the definitions of 'better' vary from person to person.
> > Please be civil and constructive while discussing this RFC. Thank you!
> >
> > Some thanks, regardless if the RFC is accepted:
> > - For providing a patch: Joe Watkins.
> > - For helping me iterate on RFC drafts: Bob Wienand, Nikita Popov and
> > Anthony Ferrara
> > - For previous RFCs on this topic: Felipe Pena and Will Fitch. I
> gleaned
> > valuable knowledge from your proposals and the discussion around them.
> >
>
>
> This is a nice and well thought proposal.
>
> I would like to suggest the addition of the "self" and "static" pseudo
> types. Most IDEs support this through @return syntax:
>
> class Foo {
> /** @return static */
> public function SetBar( $bar ) {
> // ...
> return $this;
> }
> }
>
> With the new syntax, the above could be transformed into this:
>
> class Foo {
> public function SetBar( $bar ) : static {
> // ...
> return $this;
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> Lazare INEPOLOGLOU
> Ingénieur Logiciel
>
--
Pete Boere
Web Developer