Re: Re: 5dee3c11 break

From: Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 14:46:42 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: 5dee3c11 break
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-73977@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > >> zend_std_has_dimension() doesn't know what (check_empty == 2) means. >> >> check_empty == 0 - ISSET => we don't need to call offsetGet() and relay on >> offsetExists() return value. >> check_empty == 1 - ISEMPTY => we should call offsetGet() after >> offsetExists(). >> >> NULL values should be handled by offsetExists(). >> > > I am a bit curious, isset checks that the variable exists and > is not > null; empty checks that the variable exists and is not empty. > Why does > one call offsetGet and not the other? Both look at the value. > > Sorry if I missed that bit of conversation. > yeah, no problem :) I also, don't talk that my opinion is completely right. I think that we make us and users more and more troubles with this messy behavior. Actually, you introduced new behavior (NULL check) and broke at least ZF2 and probably many based on it applications. It leads to crash and it'll make bad php experience. Then someone will report it as a security problem and we all will be blamed :( We shouldn't make existing applications crash! Thanks. Dmitry.

« previous php.internals (#73977) next »