Re: [rfc] 64bit usage, actual memory usage using real life apps

From: Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 06:09:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [rfc] 64bit usage, actual memory usage using real life apps
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-74215@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > So here are the first numbers: > > > peak mem usage: > > Wordpress master: 24.33Mb > Wordpress str_size_and_int64: 25.72Mb > delta 5.4% > > Symfony master: 26.59Mb > Symfony str_size_and_int64: 27.19Mb > delta 2.2% > > Drupal master: 23.46MB > Drupal str_size_and_int64: 24.60Mb > delta 4.63% > > There is indeed more memory used but it is less than one could expect > and very acceptable given the benefits provided by the patch. > > Also we may see more gains if class/variable/etc names use int32 > instead of size_t, as Stas pointed out it makes little sense in this > case and the implementation is much safer than any other areas in the > core (or other extensions). > Read "more gain" as "less degradation". > I feel confident that we can even get better results with phpng, once > we get the time to actually merge the 64bit patch and do further > analyzes while stabilizing phpng. > I wouldn't be so confident, before seeing the results. The relative memory consumption increase on phpng is going to be more significant. Thanks. Dmitry. > > I have to ask anyone to actually look at these numbers and the > benefits (see the other thread "on memory usage with the 64bit patch, > and interpretation of various numbers"). > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.internals (#74215) next »