Re: question regarding #67309
| From: | Andrey Andreev | Date: | Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:01:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: question regarding #67309 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-74704@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to ask what's our current consensus about feature requests like
> this: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67309
> The requested function wouldn't provide anything which isn't currently
> available via ini_get(), but it would be a bit natural to expect a get
> method where a set exists.
>
> --
> Ferenc Kovács
> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
Hi,
We talked about this with Yasuo in regards to some ext/session stuff
(although it was about setters) and agreed on keeping ini_set() only.
He even wrote a quick RFC about it:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate-ini-functions
My opinion in general is that we don't need functions that duplicate
ini_set(), ini_get() for a particular setting and existing ones should
be removed in the future instead of adding more to complement them. No
idea what other people think about it though.
Cheers,
Andrey.