Re: class names with and without opcache

From: Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:53:39 +0000
Subject: Re: class names with and without opcache
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-74991@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I've uploaded some sample code. https://github.com/devosc/opcache_disabled_test I'd appreciate it if someone could confirm whether this is a problem because it may not be possible to use 5.5 with opcache enabled (cli unit tests will be broken). On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Greg <devosc@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stas, > > > Thank you, I appreciate this. I've uploaded some sample files to > github, it uses composer as the autoloader > > https://github.com/devosc/opcache_disabled_test > > Even if I am wrong in my implementation, there should not be any > difference/errors when opcache is disabled. > > I actually prefer the improvements provided by opcache since we don't > have to come up with weird aliases like BaseConfigInterface. > > > Regards, > > > Greg > > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> Sorry to bug you, but I'd like to know if the problem I'm experiencing >>> with opcache and 5.5 is just my end or if this is a problem for >>> everybody. Could you let me know? Below is my original message to the >>> mailing list. >> >> I didn't have time to look into it yet, but I'll try to look - most >> likely on the weekend, if nobody beats me to it. >> -- >> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect >> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ >> (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > > > -- > Greg -- Greg

« previous php.internals (#74991) next »