Re: Wired constant expression syntax and bug

at least we didn't have a single test for this new syntax. Me and probably many others just didn't know about it. I just noticed Xinchen's commit, that fixed related bug. May be it's safe, may be not. I cant be sure. Thanks. Dmitry. On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 30 Jun 2014, at 23:06, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > > > I'm wondered why you introduced this wired syntax in PHP-5.6. > > > > class FooBar { > > const bar = ["bar" => 3]["bar"]; > > } > > > > It wasn't a part of RFC, it wasn't covered by tests, and it actually > > doesn't make a lot of sense. May be it's better to remove it? > > Does it harm? > > This example doesn’t make much sense, but intention of such code is > unambiguous. It is clear what should happen. > So, I’m +0 to leave it if tests are written. > > -- > Alexey Zakhlestin > CTO at Grids.by/you > https://github.com/indeyets > PGP key: http://indeyets.ru/alexey.zakhlestin.pgp.asc > > > >