Re: Revisiting Anonymous Classes

From: Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:07:08 +0000
Subject: Re: Revisiting Anonymous Classes
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-75178@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net> wrote: > Am 28.06.2014 20:53, schrieb Rowan Collins: >> Apart from a possibly new use case (although the wiki page does list "it >> would also definitely be very useful for mocking in tests" among the "Use >> Cases from the Community"), how is this proposal different from the one >> which was rejected less than a year ago? > > I probably missed the use case back then :) I like the syntax I > proposed better (including the limitation regarding extending classes > and implementing interfaces) which is more similar to that of other > languages. You still haven't stated why you intend to restrict it to only one implements/extends; I'd like to hear your reasoning.

« previous php.internals (#75178) next »