Re: [RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP

And here we go. So basically you are saying that once phpng is stabilized, no matter the api/SRC cleanness, we are good for next. This is very bad and I will vote -1 on anything close to this idea. Besides that, the same kind of estimation was done for opcache, which was a much smaller beast. They went bad by 300%, just saying. On Jul 7, 2014 2:57 PM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote: > > On 7 ביול 2014, at 08:50, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > > > > > > The problem is that people who want to add stuff for PHP 6 feel they > have to add it to phpng, because if phpng is to be PHP 6, then it would > need to be based off that branch. > > > > I don't think it's a problem, because I don't think we're two years > away from releasing a phpng-based version and I don't think it's a > moving target at this point. So I agree we need to remove these > uncertainties. > > I'm going to start an RFC-based discussion for moving phpng to master > so that the uncertainties around it are removed. > > Zeev >