Re: unsinged integer

On 22 Jul 2014, at 21:21, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote: > More seriously, UnsignedInt might go nicely alongside Andrea's BigInts… Bigints kinda remove the need for unsigned ints as you’d be able to use big signed integers of any size. I also really don’t want unsigned int because it makes integer semantics more confusing and you’re splitting integers into two different kinds, unlike bigints which are an implementation detail (there is still just one “integer” type) for the most part. I really, really don’t think this proposal is a good idea. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/