Re: PHP Language Specification
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:03:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP Language Specification | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-75915@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 23 Jul 2014, at 00:01, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote:
> Our RFCs tend to have implementations attached to them (in someone's
> personal fork). IMO we should make creating the spec PR part of the
> RFC acceptance process, and that they should be landed together. I
> agree it doesn't make much sense to define unimplemented behavior as
> the standard.
I would very much agree with that. An advantage of adding to the spec with the RFC is people can
check how well the patch lines up with the spec, too.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/