Re: phpng - loss of IS_BOOL
| From: | Laruence | Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:12:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: phpng - loss of IS_BOOL | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-75923@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hey:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm trying to work through some of the more subtle changes in phpng and
> one that sticks out is the loss of IS_BOOL. I think the explanation is
> that it removes a read, but while I'm only seeing a few uses of is_bool
> across the codebase, every one of them is used simply to convert the
> bool value into some other format. Surely what would make more sense
> here is simply to make the type_flag either true or false, and retain
> the IS_BOOL as a single identifiable type? Having two types both
> indicating 'bool' just seems wrong.
there is a _IS_BOOL macro to identifiable bool type..
you can use it in your own codes.
thanks
>
> --
> Lester Caine - G8HFL
> -----------------------------
> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
> Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
--
Laruence Xinchen Hui
http://www.laruence.com/