Re: Weird constant expression syntax and bug

Hi! > Could somebody please clarify what issues are still open here? From what > I understand, both the opcache issue and the recursion issue are fixed > now. What's the discussion about? As I understand, the issue is that if you define class constant like this: class Foo { const Bar = [0]; } everything works fine. But if you do var_dump(Foo::Bar), it bombs out with fatal error (the same goes for every other usage of that constant in expression). Please correct me if my info is outdated, but I think it is a behavior that should not be left in the release. If for some reason we can't make array constants work normally, we should just omit them altogether. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/