Re: [VOTE][RFC] intdiv()

-1 explanation: I don't think %% is clear enough, the only sensible syntax choice (//) is unavailable to us, and I think the utility of having it baked into the language as an operator is pretty minimal regardless (I coded a lot of Python for scientific research in a previous job, and I don't think I ever used //, and you'd think that's the place where you'd use it). +1 on the function, though — quick searches on Ohloh and Github suggest that there are a grand total of three open source projects that implement a global intdiv() function. Seems safe enough. Adam On 29 July 2014 19:31, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > Good evening, > > The intdiv RFC is put to the vote, with separate votes for the integer division operator (%%) > and intdiv function, the latter as a fallback. I would highly encourage you to read the discussion > in the “[RFC] intdiv()” thread and the whole RFC before voting. > > The vote is here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/intdiv#vote > > It is opened today (2014-07-30) and ends 2014-08-06. > > Thanks! > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >