Re: [VOTE] Mutliple defaults in switch statements

From: Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:51:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mutliple defaults in switch statements
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-76455@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote: > Voting is open: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/switch.default.multiple#vote > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > Some nit picks about the RFC itself: - A syntax break should require two-thirds vote, no matter how many users it impacts. It's one of the few defined parts of our RFC process[1]: "For these reasons, a feature affecting the language itself (new syntax for example) will be considered as 'accepted' if it wins a 2/3 of the votes." - Syntax breaks generally don't belong in minor versions. From the Release Process RFC[2]: "Backward compatibility must be respected with the same major releases, for example from 5.2 to 5.6." This RFC removes something that is currently possible in PHP 5, thus violating our release process. I know we've broken this rule in 5.X already; that doesn't mean we should do it again. - As already mentioned by, the length of the minimum discussion time necessary for an RFC that touches the language is two weeks[3]; this RFC was announced on August 7th, meaning it has only been one week. [1]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#required_majority [2]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess#releases_cycle [3]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#discussion_period

« previous php.internals (#76455) next »