Re: Evaluation of constructor arguments if there's no constructor
| From: | Julien Pauli | Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:04:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Evaluation of constructor arguments if there's no constructor | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-76507@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Tjerk Meesters
<tjerk.meesters@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I was sifting through the bucket o’ bugs and found these two related issues:
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67829
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54162 (closed)
>
> They concern the behaviour of the engine when a class defines no constructor or if the class to
> be instantiated doesn’t exist, which can be seen here:
> http://3v4l.org/jOQY0
>
> This is obviously a design decision, but doesn’t seem to have a mention in the documentation
> nor the spec (I couldn’t find it under the ‘new’ operator).
>
> I can add a paragraph in the documentation for it; the question is whether it should also be
> added to the spec, seeing how HHVM and PHP behave differently in this respect? It could be added as
> implementation dependent behaviour I suppose?
This is a known behavior which is part of the VM.
It is designed at http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_5_5/Zend/zend_vm_def.h#3383
I guess its an optimisation that prevents the compiler from compiling
a ZEND_DO_FCALL for constructors, which optimizes a bit the VM path
for object construction.
Dmitry should have more informations.
I'm +1 for a documentation or spec mention.
Julien.Pauli