Re: [VOTE][RFC] Closure::call()

Hi! > It does, but maybe you missed it. Under the Proposal section: > >> To solve this, we relax the current invariant of scoped closures >> having to be bound, and add a new parameter to bind(To) to produce >> an unbound, scoped closure, like so: Indeed, I missed it - I was looking for bindTo. I think it should be made more prominent, and I'm not sure what closure that is not static, but does not have a bound object, means. What happens if you call it? It sounds a bit strange concept - why would you need a closure that is not static, but is not bound to any object? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/