Re: Optional Type Hinting

Hi Levi, The implementation is really not a problem. It must be quite simple and I may take care about it. The problem that we can't come to agreement on scalar type hinting for years :( Thanks. Dmitry. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > > I see your point. For me they just don't have a lot of sense without each > > other. > > I am the author of two of those RFCs. I've worked with several members > of the HHVM team so that any inconsistencies are planned and recorded > (or will be; I know of one inconsistency in return types that is not > currently recorded). > > I also am definitely not in favor of merging them, for the reasons > Andrea outlined. > > Also, Dmitry, if you have interest in working on the implementations > for these RFCs I'm sure Joe would appreciate the help (I know I > would). >