Fwd: date extension broken tests
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:43:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Fwd: date extension broken tests | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-76856@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Derick,
Could you please take a look into these tests failures.
I actually, think that the new behavior is right.
Calls to parent::__constructor() shouldn't change value of already
constructed $this.
The expectation of ext/data/tests/bug67118_2.phpt looks completely wrong.
The actual output of ext/data/tests/bug67118.phpt seems right.
I'm going to change expectation of these tests in master if you don't
object.
Thanks. Dmitry.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: date extension broken tests
To: Lior Kaplan <lior.k@zend.com>
Cc: Anatol Belski <ab@php.net>
Hi Lior,
This is known phpng related problem described here
https://wiki.php.net/phpng#known_problems
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Lior Kaplan <lior.k@zend.com> wrote:
> Hi Anatol,
>
> It seems you've done some changes to the date extension recently, could
> you take a look at these two failures.
>
> Dmitry - FYI in case it's phpng related.
>
> Bug #67118 crashes in DateTime when this used after failed __construct
> [ext/date/tests/bug67118.phpt]
>
> Regression introduce in fix for Bug #67118 - Invalid code [ext/date/tests/bug67118_2.phpt]
>
>
> Kaplan
>