Re: Little switch improvement: get the used variable
| From: | Rowan Collins | Date: | Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:11:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Little switch improvement: get the used variable | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-77681@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Lars Strojny wrote (on 26/09/2014):
Hi everyone, On 24 Sep 2014, at 23:17, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote:I'm not sure how you see these as equivalent. As I mentioned, a switch statement is a glorified if/elseif/else, or when fallthrough is used, a glorified set of if-then-gotos.switch ( $number ) use ( === ) {[...]switch ( $age ) use ( < ) {[...]switch ( calculate_age($birth_date, $departure_date) as $age_at_departure ) use ( < ) {[...]switch ( $product ) use ( instanceOf ) {All of these examples are trying to reinvent concepts that can be solved with guards, pattern matching and overloading in other languages.
fact(N) when N>0 ->Without the additional guarantees provided by a purely functional environment, that's really just inverting the function header and if statement. Adding an extra case to that still means repeating the operator, so isn't the same as what I was talking about at all: foo(N) when N>100 ->N * fact(N-1);fact(0) ->1.
N ** foo(N-10);foo(N) when N>0 ->
N * foo(N-1);foo(0) ->
1.
In Scala one could replicate the instanceof behaviour by defining multiple methods of the same name with different argument types.Or, indeed, in most strongly typed languages; in OOP, polymorphism can be exploited for the same purpose, e.g. using the Visitor Pattern. Again, I'm not sure what this has to do with switch statements, except that overloading and polymorphism can both allow you to factor out *any* if/switch statement, if you so desire. -- Rowan Collins [IMSoP]