Re: [RFC] ZPP Failure On Overflow

Hi! > May be this overflow checks should be optional? > In old ages compilers for Wirth family languages had option to enable or > disable overflow checks. > If option is enabled we may throw an exception, if no - work as today. > Any user would be able to chose between compatibility and safety. Given that we have l and L in parameter parsing API, it is essentially optional, but the choice is on internals developer. I'm not sure having it as ini value would be the best idea, since behavior-modifying options in the past proved more trouble than they're worth - one more dimension one has to test against. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/