Re: [RFC] Move pecl_sync to core
| From: | guilhermeblanco@gmail.com | Date: | Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:18:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Move pecl_sync to core | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-77724@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> What does that even mean?
It means that any new functionality that gets into core could be considered
"young". Like when PHAR got introduced, it was a "young" extension. Same
for PDO, same for FileInfo...
What I'm trying to highlight is that being a recently coded extension or
not, it's not a good argument to say join/no join.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
>
> On 30 Sep 2014, at 20:56, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> Isn't this extension a bit "young" to join php core ?
> >
> > I agree. However, there's no equivalent existing support in PHP atm.
>
> That, in itself, is not necessarily a justification. Unless an awful lot
> of PHP users need this, it shouldn’t be in core.
>
> > Also, any new functionality introduced to PHP would always be new, young
> > and caring maturity.
>
> What does that even mean?
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
>
>
>
--
Guilherme Blanco
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
GTalk: guilhermeblanco
Toronto - ON/Canada