Re: [RFC] Move pecl_sync to core

From: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:18:57 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Move pecl_sync to core
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-77724@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> What does that even mean? It means that any new functionality that gets into core could be considered "young". Like when PHAR got introduced, it was a "young" extension. Same for PDO, same for FileInfo... What I'm trying to highlight is that being a recently coded extension or not, it's not a good argument to say join/no join. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > > On 30 Sep 2014, at 20:56, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote: > > >> Isn't this extension a bit "young" to join php core ? > > > > I agree. However, there's no equivalent existing support in PHP atm. > > That, in itself, is not necessarily a justification. Unless an awful lot > of PHP users need this, it shouldn’t be in core. > > > Also, any new functionality introduced to PHP would always be new, young > > and caring maturity. > > What does that even mean? > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada

« previous php.internals (#77724) next »