Re: Fwd: Re: dl() problem

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:05:38 +0200 (IST) Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote: > PJ>> Indeed, compare apples and peanuts, all good ;). What's about the > PJ>per> host module? > > I think it's a valid concern, but using dl() for it is not good, at > least in its present form. > By the way, how exactly do you plan to use dl() for that? Making > auto_prepend that dl()'s it, or what? How would you make access > control so that unauthorized user couldn't do the same? > > PJ>> But maybe having an idea about how other languages work will help > PJ>you to> understand all the benefits of dl. or runtime module > PJ>loading support. Or> anything good outside the ZE2 world. > > Pierre, your patronizing tone is really not in the place. Sorry for the patronizing tone, it's a mail and does not always reflect the tone (in fact, the tone is an annoyed tone). > I have very good reasons to believe that I know about "how other > languages work" at least not less than you. I do not know particular > details of implementation of one command in one particular language, > which you brought up to make your point. That means you failed to make > your point to me. Your behaviour is like if I would start to talk to > you on Ukrainian and when you couldn't get what I say I said "it's > good to learn languages, you know". Not productive. I provide the import usage as a proof than other language works perfectly with dynamic loading support. And as a sample of something nicely done, with nice features. Nothing more, nothing less. Regarding the dl issue, I think you got many points of view and arguments. If you still do not get why we need it then I suggest to rollback the deprecated and wait until we get this issue solved. Running away with that is just not the way to go, imo. pierre