Re: [VOTE] [RFC] Loop + or control structure

From: Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:20:50 +0000
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RFC] Loop + or control structure
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-77835@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 03/10/2014 22:33, Leigh wrote:
Opening the vote on loop + or control structures. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/loop_or Voting will close in 1 week and requires a 2/3 in favour to pass. Remember at this stage the implementation is flexible.
Hi, After talking with other members of AFUP, it seems most of us like the idea of having some way of executing code if a loop is never executed. The "or" keyword feels a bit odd to those who are used to the "else" of Twig (or other languages) -- but it's not really that much of a problem either: after a while, we'll get used to using "or" (or some other keyword). So, we would be on the +1 side of things on this. Still, Sara's idea of giving all loop constructs a return value indicating the number of times the loop executed feels great -- and this would probably be more flexible than loop...or I'm guessing this is why you voted "no" on your own RFC? -- Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG http://php-internals.afup.org/

« previous php.internals (#77835) next »